This
is scary man! (week 7)
Figure 1: Alcohol treated microplastic #5 co-incubated with P. fluorescens. Notice the rod-shaped Pseudomonas fluorescens. |
Figure 2: Alcohol treated microplastic #5. |
This week we had an opportunity to
check microplastics co-incubated with Pseudomonas species on a microscopic
level. My preference for Pseudomonas species is Pseudomonas fluorescens, so I
observed P. fluorescens with microplastics. For microscopic analysis, we used
the one and only Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Previously we used the SEM
machine to create a baseline image for our treated plastics. Since my study
involves colonization and biodegradation of microplastics, the baseline images
will aid in the comparison between the treated microplastics and the
co-incubated (microplastic + P. fluorescens) plastics types. The scary part for
me was that under the SEM the plastics co-incubated with P. fluorescens didn’t
have a smooth surface (figure 1) when compared to the alcohol-treated
microplastics (figure 2). Now, this doesn’t mean that Pseudomonas species
biodegrades microplastics (although that’s my hypothesis). To show
biodegradation, we need a control time. The co-incubated microplastics viewed
this week were from last semester, so there’s no specific time. To show
biodegradation between Pseudomonas species and microplastics, the team has set
out four control timelines (7 days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days). The coming
weeks will be crucial for our research, and I hope we get our hypothesized
results.
Comments
Post a Comment